Alain M. Lafon » C# http://blog.dispatched.ch code, life and struggles thereof Mon, 16 Jan 2012 13:44:17 +0000 en hourly 1 C# 4.0′s dynamicityhttp://blog.dispatched.ch/2010/05/10/c-40s-dynamicity/ http://blog.dispatched.ch/2010/05/10/c-40s-dynamicity/#comments Mon, 10 May 2010 21:23:21 +0000 Alain M. Lafon http://blog.dispatched.ch/?p=985 I just found an article ranking highly on Hacker News (my favourite read) concerning the release of C# 4.0 – you can find it on blogs.msdn.com. On this blog Microsoft claims a couple of highly sophistacated new features. Being the spoiled guy I am, they just seem natural to me. Since they started their article with the words “The dynamic keyword is a key feature of this release.”, let me demonstrate the new features in a really dynamically typed language where they have been around for quite some time: Python

Dynamic

C#

 
                        dynamic contact = new ExpandoObject();
                        contact.Name = "Patrick Hines";
                        contact.Phone = "206-555-0144";

Python

 
                        class contact: None
                        contact.Name = "Patrick Hines"
                        contact.Phone = "206-555-0144"

Optional (or Default) Parameters

C#

 
                        public static void SomeMethod(int optional = 0) { }
                        SomeMethod(); // 0 is used in the method.
                        SomeMethod(10);

Python

 
                        def some_method(optional = 0): pass
                        some_method()
                        some_method(10)

Named Arguments

C#

 
                        var sample = new List<String>();
                        sample.InsertRange(collection: new List<String>(), index: 0);
                        sample.InsertRange(index: 0, collection: new List<String>());

Python

 
                        def foo(bar, foobar): None
                        foo(bar='asdf', foobar=12)
                        foo(foobar=12, bar='asdf')

I honestly know that a comparison of a statically typed language on the CLR and an interpreted dynamic language doesn’t account for too much. But since Microsoft is making a fuzz about dynamic being the keyword of the new release, I felt the urge to drop this note.

The Python code was tested with v2.5 – that’s the oldest installation I’ve got. However, it’s old enough, because .NET didn’t even have decent IPC back then (i.e. Named pipes were added in .NET 3.5).

Well, that’s my rant for the night – I’m going back to teaching myself a real programmers language(Clojure) – as you should, too(;


    If you liked the article, follow me on twitter here
twitter_preek
]]> http://blog.dispatched.ch/2010/05/10/c-40s-dynamicity/feed/ 1